|
Blond, James Blond
By Jeff Schwister
Thursday, October 20, 2005
It
seems the color of his follicles is the most newsworthy
part of Daniel Craig becoming the new James Bond. But
can we please get past the hair and look at the man
attempting to fill the shaken, not stirred shoes? After
all these are pretty big loafers - Sean Connery, Roger
Moore, Pierce Bronsan, and, however briefly, Timothy
Dalton & George Lazenby, all played the role with the
famous digits.
And is Daniel Craig up to the task? He told Reuters
that he was shopping when he received the telephone
call confirming him as Bond. "I dropped what I was
carrying. I went straight to the alcohol section and
got myself a bottle of vodka, a bottle of vermouth and
went back and made myself a Martini...or two." Okay,
so he's off to a good start.
Craig's widest exposure to date was as the annoying
son in The Road to Perdition. It was one of those
roles that left an awful impression on the audience.
Which was exactly the point. His character was spineless,
undeserving and pathetic and his acting held up against
Paul Newman, Jude Law and Tom Hanks. Perhaps others
have seen him in Lara Croft: Tomb Raider and
The Jacket.
The role that impressed critics the most was from this
year's Layer Cake. Craig plays a drug dealer
hoping for early retirement with one more big score.
It sounds basic enough but he gives an alluring performance.
One of those quintessential "smartest guy in the room"
kinds of roles that just oozes confidence.
It was probably Layer Cake that sold MGM on
Craig donning the iconic suit of Bond. But here’s the
thing, no one man makes or breaks a James Bond film.
The director and screenwriter have as much influence
on a successful, memorable film. And that is where the
Bond franchise has done poorly in recent years. Can
you truly separate Brosnan’s performances from one another?
Is there a bad guy that stands out? Yes, I know Halle
Berry looked good in the swimsuit but that is not enough
for a movie franchise that should be in a class of it’s
own.
So who is lucky and talented enough to direct? Martin
Campbell, the director of The Mask of Zorro and
its upcoming sequel. Campbell is also credited with
Vertical Limit starring Chirs O’Donnell. But
he probably got the job because of directing GoldenEye,
Brosnan’s first Bond flick which helped resurrect the
franchise a decade ago.
And then there are the writers, Neal Purvis and Robert
Wade. This writing team has collaborated for Die
Another Day, The World is Not Enough and
the spy spoof Johnny English. No college kid
or movie buff is quoting lines from any of those movies.
And yes, these two are the ones responsible for Denise
Richards’ lines as Dr. Christmas Jones.
Shouldn’t the audience expect memorable one-liners,
Bond Women who aren’t a joke, great villains, and cool
gadgets (NOT invisible cars)?
According to the Associated Press, Campbell
says, "more character and less gadgets." More
character is a great idea, but we can't make a boring
Bond movie. And less gadgets is like saying Christmas
with less presents - what’s the point?
The film will be Casino Royale, which was previously
made with Peter Sellers as James Bond and Woody Allen
as Jimmy Bond. Kidding, almost. Casino Royale
the movie was a spoof made in 1967 based on Ian Fleming’s
first Bond novel published in 1953. The film will showcase
Bond first becoming a "00" agent.
At least Ian Fleming will be involved somehow. Keep
in mind most Bond films lately have not been based on
his books.
It just seems there are obvious choices for director
that actually bring something to the table. There was
a rumor that Quentin Tarantino had been interested in
the project. Another name that comes to mind are J.J.
Abrams who has proved himself with Lost and Alias
(the early years). Even Matthew Vaughn who directed
Layer Cake would be a good choice. After all,
we know he can get the most out of Craig. Or what about
Joss Whedon? Not many people saw Serenity in
the theater but he wrote an intelligent, interesting
villain (the Operative) and had a no-name actor (Chiwetel
Ejiofor) make him memorable. He could do the same thing
for a Bond villain except this time people are guaranteed
to go.
I think this is what bothers me the most - James Bond
films are a guarantee at the box office. There should
be a rotation of fantastic young directors who get to
leave their mark on the franchise. Daniel Craig is a
great choice for the next James Bond, but the Bond franchise
is going to need more help than just a great leading
man.
|